Let’s Refute Stephen Hawking

Over time, I’ve come to expect nothing short of top-notch from Fox News.  Whether it be their televised reporting or articles on their website, I have come to expect nothing less than poorly-informed, misguided, and often arrogant reporting.  Generally speaking, they could be worse.  But sometimes, they spew something particularly unpleasant.  One of those who was recently on the receiving end of the aforementioned quality was esteemed physicist Stephen Hawking.

As you may know, Stephen Hawking recently published a new book, The Grand Design, which was co-written with Leonerd Mlodinow.  You can check out the book on Amazon here.  In his book, Stephen Hawking focuses on the origins of the universe from the point of view of theoretical physics.  From his book,

“Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing,” the professor said in his new book. “It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the universe going.”

While it is not likely that Hawking’s goal was to stir up controversy from the religious, he surely accomplished that.  It seems that God’s last legitimate vestige in the scientific community is his possible role as the proverbial clock-winder.  There had to be someone to get the ball rolling, right?  Not according to Stephen Hawking.

Of course, Fox News had something to say about this.  In a minute article by Fox News Opinion columnist Cal Thomas, Hawkings work is pitted against lonely, unsourced quotes that are questionable at best.  The article starts with:

Stephen Hawking is out with another book that will delight his fellow atheists. Hawking says there is no room for God in science and that a creator is not behind the universe. Gravity, he says, is what united particles after the “Big Bang” and produced our planet, this universe and many other universes in which he believes life also exists.

Innocent enough.  What comes next is reminiscent of a Sunday-school brat  comeback:

Here are some verses that refute that: “Anyone who wishes to know God, must first acknowledge he exists;” “Were you there when I laid the foundations of the world?” “God has chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise.”

As one translation puts it: “God chose what is nonsense in the world to make the wise feel ashamed. God chose what is weak in the world to make the strong feel ashamed.”

And then there are these: “the fool has said in his heart ‘there is no God’” and “the gospel is foolishness to those who are perishing.”

If Hawking thinks it’s all foolishness, isn’t that evidence he is perishing?

They took a paraphrased version of an excerpt or Hawkings book and went directly to quasi-religious quotes to “refute” the work of a highly experienced and educated theoretical physicist and cosmologist.  And who is doing the “refuting?”  Some syndicated columnist working for Fox News.

Who are you going to believe?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Let’s Refute Stephen Hawking

  1. Ron Krumpos says:

    In “The Grand Design” Stephen Hawking postulates that the M-theory may be the Holy Grail of physics…the Grand Unified Theory which Einstein had tried to formulate and later abandoned. It expands on quantum mechanics and string theories.

    In my e-book on comparative mysticism is a quote by Albert Einstein: “…most beautiful and profound emotion we can experience is the sensation of the mystical. It is the sower of all true science. To know that what is impenetrable to us really exists, manifesting itself as the highest wisdom and most radiant beauty – which our dull faculties can comprehend only in their primitive form – this knowledge, this feeling, is at the center of all religion.”

    Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity is probably the best known scientific equation. I revised it to help better understand the relationship between divine Essence (Spirit), matter (mass/energy: visible/dark) and consciousness (fx raised to its greatest power). Unlike the speed of light, which is a constant, there are no exact measurements for consciousness. In this hypothetical formula, basic consciousness may be of insects, to the second power of animals and to the third power the rational mind of humans. The fourth power is suprarational consciousness of mystics, when they intuit the divine essence in perceived matter. This was a convenient analogy, but there cannot be a divine formula.

    • Cody Deitz says:

      I’m wowed. Thank you so much for bringing the expertise that I could not even hope to have. My chosen field of study is certainly not any branch of physics. I’d much rather discuss literary criticism. I’m enjoying your insights into consciousness. Thanks again for your thoughts. Cheers.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s